Sunday, April 23, 2017

March for Science's Blindspot

Japanese awareness of humankind's contribution to global warming is among the highest in the world. The same is true for public acceptance of evolution. These are two of the facts that are front and center in the March for Science.

Then why was March for Science in Japan such a failure. Only two were held in the whole country, in Tokyo and Tsukuba. Nothing in Kansai. Nothing in Tohoku. Nothing in Kyushu. Participation at the marches was at the level of a large family picnic. Japanese participation hovered near zero.

Part of the problem is likely competition from numerous Earth Day celebrations. At least 10 were held across Japan. Earth Day Tokyo is in its 28th year and annually attracts more than 100,000 attendees. In contrast to Washington, D.C., where Earth Day and March for Science coordinated, March for Science Tokyo was unable to work with Earth Day Tokyo.

But the main problem, I think, is in the failure of March for Science to recognize that the war against facts in the United States is deeply rooted in that country's systemic racism. Indeed, March for Science itself has been accused of being a microcosm of liberal racism.

Opposition to climate change is but one example of Lee Atwaters's Rules.
The late, legendarily brutal campaign consultant Lee Atwater explains how Republicans can win the vote of racists without sounding racist themselves: 
[Edited] You start out in 1954 by saying, “N----r, n----r, n----r.” By 1968 you can’t say “n----r”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “N----r, n----r.”

Views on evolution and creationism have even stronger ties to racism.

Why is March for Science blind to racism? Perhaps this is because public schools in the United States are highly segregated and strongly favor whites. Except for the addition of immigrants, America's science establishment is a product of this school system. American science is very much a part of the problem it is protesting.

Until scientists go beyond generic diversity statements to combat the racism that is behind the war on facts, they will make no progress on facts in public policy.

While March for Science should be grateful for international help, it needs to recognize that the struggle it is fighting was made in the USA and cannot expect others to simply jump on their bandwagon. It also needs to show some humility. The rest of the world did not cause or even contribute to American science's current fix.

The problem is not Americans' blindness toward science; it is American science's blindness and complicity to its own systemic misogyny and racism.


Monday, April 3, 2017

International Community Populations in Tsukuba and Ibaraki


Tsukuba, 3 April 2017. These are the most recent statistics available for populations of foreign residents in Ibaraki Prefecture.



  Total
Pop
Foreign China South
Korea
Philip-
pines
Viet-
nam
Brazil Nepal USA Taiwan Other
Mito 270859 3311 657 805 394 313 26 124 108 36 848
Hitachi 187503 1727 418 202 592 52 24 34 43 20 342
Tsuchiura 142567 3535 643 278 888 165 451 50 29 139 892
Koga 141952 2909 444 173 888 260 205 31 18 62 828
Ishioka 77302 947 153 106 165 40 71 10 9 64 329
Yuki 51726 2035 273 28 317 260 360 173 7 21 596
Ryugasaki 79279 1476 367 101 353 69 92 26 21 24 423
Shimotsuma 43829 1808 191 40 354 127 160 30 9 56 841
Joso 63634 4614 268 64 1096 190 2023 36 3 30 904
Hitachi Ota 53684 133 41 18 23 8 2 6 6 1 28
Takahagi 29815 144 23 20 32 3 20 5 7 1 33
Kitaibaraki 44782 242 42 47 39 14 13 0 7 1 79
Kasama 77723 605 100 54 101 35 73 17 16 12 197
Toride 107310 1471 368 167 161 158 132 131 27 36 291
Ushiku 83531 1117 249 76 159 27 322 20 19 29 216
Tsukuba 219402 9059 3222 898 374 381 323 129 228 262 3242
Hitachinaka 156964 1427 448 113 333 102 28 37 44 27 295
Kashima 66700 913 190 113 190 56 36 11 21 43 253
Itako 29621 324 46 25 47 10 11 13 5 15 152
Moriya 63693 770 208 115 66 53 118 7 32 31 140
Hitachi Omiya 43496 248 50 48 24 22 27 6 7 4 60
Naka 53835 211 43 30 47 25 0 7 8 3 48
Chikusei 105816 2171 196 106 475 143 224 34 10 61 922
Bando 55275 2131 273 107 401 208 67 40 14 35 986
Inashiki 44556 938 206 52 142 79 51 13 5 23 367
Kasumigaura 42515 1035 102 24 77 64 292 0 5 7 464
Sakuragawa 43826 291 76 25 37 30 8 8 5 7 95
Kamisu 94143 2264 633 104 393 162 185 0 13 145 629
Namagata 35967 946 395 17 86 83 5 10 5 10 335
Hokota 48355 2251 764 48 111 543 1 7 4 11 762
Tsukubamirai 46517 507 83 71 81 64 51 6 7 19 125
Omitama 51844 1262 209 72 120 171 42 5 8 34 601
                       
Ibaraki total 2933381 58182 12510 4403 9352 4359 5743 1085 785 1339 18606

2016-10 Total population stats from http://www.pref.ibaraki.jp/hokenfukushi/koso/iji/koso/stachischics/health-welfare-report/2013.html
2016-12 Foreign population stats from http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/List.do?lid=000001177523

Sunday, March 26, 2017

Sending your elementary school child to cram school in Tsukuba, some comments

The only reason to go to cram school while in elementary school is to get into Namiki or Meikei. Those are integrated junior-senior high schools, both tier 1. (Namiki is public; Meikei is private.) Their students do not have to worry about cramming for senior high school entrance exams. Other than Namiki and Meikei, there are only two tier 1 public high schools in the area, Takezono and Tsuchiura 1. Cram schools are almost essential in getting into one of them. Unfortunately, in this area there is a big gap between tier 1 and tier 2 public high schools. (Ushiku Eishin and Tsuchura 2 are the two tier 2 schools in the area.)

[Added note: In American terminology, Takezono, Tsuchiura 1, Namiki and Meikei can be called exam schools (http://educationnext.org/exam-schools-from-the-inside). Meikei is private and makes its own entrance exams. The other three are run by Ibaraki Prefecture, which develops one exam each year for all prefectural high schools. These four high schools operate on the assumption that all students will go on to universities.]

The tier 1 high schools themselves are effectively cram schools. Like the jr high cram schools, they pack 3 years of materials into the first 2 years and spend the 3rd year on review and practice exams. (Takezono 3rd year students only have one new textbook.) Several of the practice exams are run by cram school chains, Kawai and Benesse. Results come back with ratings versus their selected target universities, plus quite detailed diagnostics. Other "short" tests are 10-min, 4-subject quizes with more than any student can handle - simply to get them accustomed to hitting the ground running.

We send our son, now a 3rd yr HS student at Takezono, to cram school for math starting late in his 2nd year Yatabe JHS. We've continued with cram school math in high school because there is an excellent instructor who specializes in Takezono HS math. 

We are very pleased with the results. Our son went from hating math to loving it. A key seemed to be have friends-cum-rivals to team up with and compete with. 

I have come to appreciate the system here, even though it is completely alien from my rural public schools in MN of 45 years ago.



Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Compartmentalization: What President Obama accomplished on his Asia trip

"Compartmentalization" is my working view of President Obama's main accomplishment on his Asia trip. The only visible action in Japan was his statement that the US is bound by treaty to defend Japan's administration of the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. He still gave China one avenue to pursue, the International Court of Justice.

The effect of his statement will be to reduce the chances of a nasty surprise over the possession of these islands. A side effect is to essentially sideline Japan so that the US can pursue engagement with China with less attention to Japan's views. The US has concluded that Japan will not become a constructive partner with respect to China, so it will settle for Japan on the sidelines.



Friday, April 25, 2014

Regional Revitalization from the Ground Up

In his history of Tochigi Prefecture1, Masami Omachi describes concerns that Fumitsugu Okada, Tochigi Governor between 1911 and 1914, had about plans for two new rail lines. One railway, the Moka Line, would connect the pottery industry around Mashiko to a trunk railway at Shimodate in Ibaraki Prefecture. The other railway, the Ashio Line, would connect the Ashio copper mine to a trunk railway at Kiryu in Gumma Prefecture. Governor Okada worried that, because these two railways would connect to other prefectures, they would detract economically and administratively from Tochigi.

The notion that new 'sidedoor' rail connections for moving local products to markets would be viewed as a threat to local economy and government floated unmoored in my mind until a seminar on attracting industry for regional revitalization.

This seminar, "Attracting Industry and Regional Revitalization: Changing Cannot to Can," was put on by the Ken-Oh-Do corridor development association2 and featured two speakers. Both speakers can be considered authoritative representatives of current thinking in Japan.

Yasumasa Takano is Director of the Industrial Location Department at the Japan Industrial Location Center (JILC). According to its website, JILC is an independent public agency working in regional and industrial planning and implementation under the auspices of the Ministry of Economic Trade and Industry (METI). A bureaucrat, Mr. Takano presented a bureaucrat's view of industrial location trends and forces in Japan - a PowerPoint presentation with handouts loaded with facts, figures and charts, but without the slides.

From Mr. Takano's presentation, I concluded that JILC and its bureaucratic split with JETRO are two of the greatest impediments for FDI. Extremely parochial.

Toshiaki Kimura's position is Evangelist for Regional Vitality in the Cabinet Secretariat. From 1984 until joining the Cabinet Secretariat in 2006, Mr. Kimura worked in the economic development sections of Otaru City, Hokkaido. A celebrity with a blog, Twitter account and Facebook page, Mr. Kimura used a whiteboard and black marker for his presentation. This fluid motivational talk was filled with local stories, starting with one from his hometown of Nishiokoppe, a village in Hokkaido that is home to 1200 people and 30,000 deer.

Notes and References:

1Masami Omachi, Tochigi Ken no Hyakunen (One Hundred Years of Tochigi Prefecture), Yamakawa Shuppan, 1986, pp. 113-114, http://amzn.to/twgSkD
2Ibaraki-ken Kenodo Ensen Chiiki Sangyo Koryu Kasseika Kyogikai (茨城県圏央道沿線地域産業・交流活性化協議会), literally translated as "Association for Revitalization of Regional Industry and Exchange Along the Ken-O-Do Expressway in Ibaraki Prefecture," was established in 2007 as an association of cities and towns along the expressway. The Ken-O-Do Expressway is an outer ring around Tokyo that will connect Narita International Airport through a band of industrial exurbs. Website: http://www.ken-o-do-ibaraki.com/site_gaiyo/index.html (accessed 2012 March 4)


Singing in the park

Overheard in the park and sung by elementary students walking home from school: When I get to be a first grader, when I get to be a first grader, my friend will commit suicide. 一年生になったら、一年生になったら友達が自殺するかな。
This is a based on a very widely sung preschool song: When I get to be a first grader, when I get to be a first grader, I will make 100 friends.一年生になったら一年生になったらともだち100人ができるかな。